Students’ Mathematics Reasoning Ability Reviewing from Learning Interest of Students at SMPN 16 Pekanbaru

  • Dewi Yuliani Universitas Riau
Keywords: Learning Interest, Reasoning Ability, Social Arithmetic

Abstract

This research .is.motivated. by the. existence of. facts. in the.field.which. show.the.low.mathematical.reasoning.skills found in students at SMP Negeri 16 Pekanbaru. One thing that students must master to achieve learning goals is mathematical reasoning abilities. In other words, students can use mathematics as a reasoning tool both in learning mathematics in class and everyday life. This research aims to determine the difference between students' mathematical reasoning abilities and low learning interest. Good student learning interest will make students happy to learn mathematics without coercion, with good learning interest will affect students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Mathematical reasoning abilities can be improved through increasing student interest in learning. This research is a qualitative descriptive study, the population in this study were all eighth-grade students of the 2020/2021 academic year. The sample taken was class VIII.2 using a random cluster. Data collection techniques and research instruments are tests of mathematical reasoning abilities on quadrilateral material, questionnaires in questionnaire sheets for learning interests, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that: 1) There are differences in mathematical reasoning abilities between students who have high learning interests. 2) There are differences in mathematical reasoning abilities between students with low interest in learning.

References

A. D. Putri and A. Yuliani, “Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa MA di Kabupaten Bandung Barat pada Materi Barisan dan Deret,” J. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 400–409, 2019.

M. P. Azmi, “Penerapan Pendekatan Concrete-Representational-Abstract (CRA) Berbasis Intuisi Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa SMP,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 68–80, 2017.

M. Andriani and M. Hariyani, Pembelajaran matematika SD/MI. Pekanbaru: Benteng Media, 2013.

S. Chotimah, “Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa Smp Di Kota Bandung Dengan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Educations Pada Siswa SMP di Kota Bandung,” J. Didakt., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2015.

R. Deswita, Y. S. Kusumah, and J. A. Dahlan, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran CORE dengan Pendekatan Scientific,” Edumatika J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2018.

BSNP, Salinan Lampiran Permendiknas Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. 2006.

A. Fadillah, “Analisis Minat Belajar dan Bakat Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa,” Mathline J. Mat. Dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 2016.

S. Isnaeni, L. Fajriyah, E. S. Risky, R. Purwasih, and W. Hidayat, “Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus,” J. MEDIVES J. Math. Educ. IKIP Veteran Semarang, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 107–116, 2018.

Isrok’atun and A. Rosmala, Model-Model Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2018.

Juhrani, H. Suyitno, and Khumaedi, “Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Berdasarkan Self-Efficacy Siswa pada Model Pembelajaran MEA,” Unnes J. Math. Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 251–258, 2017.

I. Kusmaryono, “Analysis of Narrative Mathematical Questions on Textbooks Based on Solo Taxonomy and Mathematical Power,” Daya Mat. J. Inov. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 299–314, 2017.

K. Jasija, F. A. Fitriana, and U. Aripin, “Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa,” JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Mat. Inov., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 915–922, 2018.

Nizam, Ringkasan Hasil-hasil Asesmen Belajar Dari Hasil UN, PISA, TIMSS, INAP. Jakarta: Puspendik, 2016.

H. Nurdiana, “Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Ditinjau dari Minat Belajar,” J. Pendidik. Mat. Semarang, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 45–50, 2015.

M. Ario, “Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMK Setelah Mengikuti Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah,” J. Ilm. Edu Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2016.

B. Prasetyo and L. M. Jannah, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009.

D. Rachmayani, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Matematika Siswa,” Pas. J. Math. Educ. J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2014.

Riduwan, Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.

S. Siregar, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif : Dilengkapi dengan Perbandingan Perhitungan Manual & SPSS. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.

A. Shoimin, 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.

T. S. Sumartini, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2015.

T. R. Suprihatin, R. Maya, and E. Senjayawati, “Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Segitiga dan Segiempat,” JKPMI J. Kaji. Pembelajaran Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–13, 2018.

R. Ahmadi, Pengantar Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.

C. Saiz and S. F. Rivas, “New Teaching Techniques to Improve Critical Thinking. The Diaprove Methodology,” Educ. Res. Q., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 3–36, 2016.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Salinan Lampiran Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003.

A. Yuliani, “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Pada Mahasiswa Melalui Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL),” Infin. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2015.

Z. Amir and Risnawati, Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2016.

M. Zein, Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Pekanbaru: Daulat Riau, 2012.

Published
2021-12-30
Section
Articles